More recently, Church published RCTs demonstrating remarkably promising results from a small number of sessions with EFT for trauma symptoms ( Church et al., 2012 Church, 2014 Church and Brooks, 2014 Church and Palmer-Hoffman, 2014). One study showed a moderate ES ( d = 0.67), while in two studies the ES could not be calculated. In an overview from 2012 on research in the field of energy psychology therapies ( Feinstein, 2012), 18 RCTs were described, of which 15 demonstrated large ES on at least one clinical outcome for TFT or EFT. These methods may also be more acceptable for patients who are reluctant to experience in vivo exposure to feared situations, as is required in CBTs ( Hawton et al., 1989). These therapies consist of imaginal exposure combined with acupressure, i.e., tapping at acupoints, and aim to reduce anxiety over the course of a few sessions ( Callahan and Trubo, 2001), thus having the potential to reach many patients. One such group of therapies are the so-called energy psychology therapies, primarily in the forms of TFT ( Callahan and Trubo, 2001) or EFT ( Craig, 2007). It is therefore of value to test other therapies aimed at reducing the symptoms of anxiety disorders, particularly therapies that practitioners can learn quickly and easily.
THOUGHT FIELD THERAPY HOW TO TRIAL
Trial Registration:, identifier NCT00932919.Īnxiety disorders are common ( Kringlen et al., 2001), although the number of therapists delivering documented effective treatments has been limited ( Collins et al., 2011). The study indicated that TFT may be an efficient treatment for patients with agoraphobia.
![thought field therapy how to thought field therapy how to](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71iWHggJySL.jpg)
Post-treatment and at the 12-month follow-up, there were not significant differences between CBT and TFT ( p = 0.33 and p = 0.90, respectively).Ĭonclusion: This paper reports the first study comparing TFT to CBT for any disorder. Results: Both CBT and TFT showed better results than the WLC ( p < 0.001) at post-treatment. For statistical comparisons, we used the independent sample’s t-test, the Fisher’s exact test and the ANOVA and ANCOVA tests. The primary outcome measure was a symptom score from the Anxiety Disorders Interview Scale that was performed by an interviewer blinded to the treatment condition. After the post WL randomization, we compared CBT ( N = 12 + 24 = 36) to TFT ( N = 12 + 24 = 36), applying the pre-treatment scores as baseline for all patients. At first we compared the three groups CBT, TFT, and WL. Following a 3 months waiting period, the WL patients were randomized to CBT ( n = 12) or TFT ( n = 12), and all patients were reassessed after treatment or waiting period and at 12 months follow-up.
THOUGHT FIELD THERAPY HOW TO PLUS
Methods: Seventy-two patients were randomized to CBT ( N = 24), TFT ( N = 24) or a wait-list condition (WLC) ( N = 24) after a diagnostic procedure including the MINI PLUS that was performed before treatment or WLC. This study compares the efficacy of TFT and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for patients with agoraphobia. Hence, there is a need for studies comparing TFT to well-established treatments.